Skip to content

Systematic FTO

Stop Paying For More Patent Searching Than You Need

Systematic FTO

Stop Paying For More Patent Searching Than You Need

Most clients get the certainty they need after a single fixed-fee cycle.

Our Systematic Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) analysis helps you reduce the uncertainty around patent infringement through a structured, attorney-led process — not just another patent search.

No obligation to continue beyond Cycle 1.

How Your Confidence Increases

Every FTO reaches a point where spending more money produces smaller improvements in certainty.

Our methodology is designed to capture the biggest increase in confidence first.

  • Cycle 1 combines AI-assisted semantic search with attorney review to identify the patent risks most likely to affect your commercial decision.
  • Cycles 2, 3, 4… systematically expand into new patent classes and competitor portfolios discovered in Cycle 1.
  • Each cycle reviews a new, non-overlapping group of patent publications, so you’re never paying to evaluate the same patents twice.
  • You decide when the remaining uncertainty is commercially acceptable.

Unlike conventional FTO studies, there’s no need to commit your full budget upfront. You stop when you’ve reached the level of confidence your business requires.

A conventional search tries to find patents. Our methodology is designed to answer a commercial decision: whether the remaining uncertainty is low enough to proceed. That’s why every cycle has a defined objective, a structured increase in confidence, and a clear stopping point.


Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 only proceed if you decide the remaining uncertainty justifies further investment — not by default.

The Question That Actually Matters

Most providers simply search for patents. We help you answer the question that actually matters:

"Can I commercially launch this product with acceptable patent risk?"

Traditional “landscape” searches often hand you hundreds of patents and a long report — without telling you whether you’ve searched enough, how much risk remains, where to search next, or whether spending more would meaningfully improve your certainty. Search expands until the budget runs out, not until you know enough.

Most FTO searches increase search volume. Not decision certainty.

We do not simply search for more patents — we systematically reduce uncertainty until you decide you've reached an acceptable level of risk.

Build Confidence as Your Product Develops

While early-stage development typically needs only limited FTO coverage, greater certainty matters more as you move toward launch. Cycles 2, 3, 4… let you build that certainty step by step, only when you decide it’s worth it — each one expanding into the next-highest-risk area identified earlier, never repeating work you’ve already paid for.

Why Systematic FTO Is Different

Landscape FTO

Systematic FTO (S&P)

How It Works

Step 1 · Cycle 1 only

Surface the candidates

We use AI-assisted semantic search to identify the patents most likely to overlap with your product, searched worldwide to identify relevant patent families before determining where patent rights are actually in force.

Step 2 · every cycle

Prioritise the risks

We classify every candidate patent as relevant, maybe relevant, or not relevant. This defines exactly where the next search cycle begins, so we don’t waste time — or your budget — reviewing the same patents again.

Step 3 · every cycle

Validate the threats

Our licensed patent attorneys review the most relevant claims against your product, claim by claim, and identify which patents genuinely warrant further legal attention — and which can be set aside.

What You Receive

After Cycle 1, you receive:

Most clients get the answers they need from Cycle 1 alone.

Is This Right For You?

A Systematic FTO is most valuable if:

Common Misconceptions

Most FTO failures start with one of these four assumptions.

“I have a patent, so I can sell my product.”

False. A patent gives you the right to exclude others — it doesn’t clear you against an earlier, broader patent that may still block your launch.

“We only sell in one country, so we only need to search there.”

Not enough. Patent families span borders. A patent that’s live in your target market may only surface if you search worldwide first — then check where it’s actually in force.

“An FTO is a one-time exercise.”

Not really. Patent landscapes change daily. An FTO is a point-in-time opinion, not a permanent clearance — which is exactly why a cycle-based approach matches how products actually develop.

“FTO means finding every relevant patent.”

Impossible. 100% coverage is never achievable. The goal is to reduce commercially significant uncertainty to a level you’re comfortable launching with — systematically, not exhaustively.

Why S&P Developed This Methodology

After years of conducting Freedom-to-Operate analyses, we realised many clients didn’t need a bigger search — they needed a better way to know when enough searching had been done. The Systematic FTO methodology combines that experience, across EP, DE, SG and UPC jurisdictions, with modern AI-assisted search tools and attorney-led legal analysis.

FAQs

Get your questions answered.

Find answers to common questions about our Sprint Patents services, including patent drafting, Invention Harvesting, Freedom-to-Operate studies, Systematic FTO and Infringement Analysis.

Visit our FAQ page to learn more about how our services work, what you can expect, and which option may be right for you.

Start With Cycle 1

Most clients never need to go beyond Cycle 1. If you do, every additional cycle builds on the work already completed.

Fixed fee. 10-day turnaround. No obligation beyond Cycle 1.

See How a Systematic FTO Works

Download the Cycle 1 Overview to see:





    You'll receive the Cycle 1 Overview by email instantly. Our team will then reach out to discuss your product and whether Cycle 1 makes sense for you.